Not all compression types can be detected in the seccomp sandbox, so we
need to disable it. This requires either configuring makepkg to know the
sandbox is available, or checking for file >= 5.38 in which the sandbox
option is a no-op even when seccomp is disabled.
- Requires autoconf-archive for autotools version compare macro.
- meson version comparison could be made a lot simpler using meson-git.
Fixes FS#58626
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
This works everywhere that gpgme >= 1.13.0 because it is a pkg-config
dependency, and meson 0.51 adds a fallback config-tool dependency
provider that detects older versions of gpgme seamlessly via
gpgme-config.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Since DUFLAGS and DUPATH are not needed anymore remove them from the
source
Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres <santiago@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Provide both build systems in parallel for now, to ensure that we work
out all the differences between the two. Some time from now, we'll give
up on autotools.
Meson tends to be faster and probably easier to read/maintain. On my
machine, the full meson configure+build+install takes a little under
half as long as a similar autotools-based invocation.
Building with meson is a two step process. First, configure the build:
meson build
Then, compile the project:
ninja -C build
There's some mild differences in functionality between meson and
autotools. specifically:
1) No singular update-po target. meson only generates individual
update-po targets for each textdomain (of which we have 3). To make
this easier, there's a build-aux/update-po script which finds all
update-po targets and runs them.
2) No 'make dist' equivalent. Just run 'git archive' to generate a
suitable tarball for distribution.
