Harvey Harrison 19f47c634e x86: x86_32 has its own irq_regs definition ... Impact: cleanup Arches that have their own irq_regs definition are expected to define ARCH_HAS_OWN_IRQ_REGS or else a generic (unused) set will also be defined in lib/irq_regs.c Sparse noticed the unused generic one had no prototype: lib/irq_regs.c:15:1: warning: symbol 'per_cpu____irq_regs' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>		2008-11-10 08:41:47 +01:00
..
asm	x86: x86_32 has its own irq_regs definition	2008-11-10 08:41:47 +01:00