This is being done in preparation for the migration from ashmem to
memfd. In order for tmpfs objects to be usable across the Treble
boundary, they need to be declared in public policy whereas, they're
currently all declared in private policy as part of the
tmpfs_domain() macro. Remove the type declaration from the
macro, and remove tmpfs_domain() from the init_daemon_domain() macro
to avoid having to declare the *_tmpfs types for all init launched
domains. tmpfs is mostly used by apps and the media frameworks.
Bug: 122854450
Test: Boot Taimen and blueline. Watch videos, make phone calls, browse
internet, send text, install angry birds...play angry birds, keep
playing angry birds...
Change-Id: I20a47d2bb22e61b16187015c7bc7ca10accf6358
These denials seem to be caused by a race with the process that labels
the files. While we work on fixing them, hide the denials.
Bug: 68864350
Bug: 70180742
Test: Built policy.
Change-Id: I58a32e38e6384ca55e865e9575dcfe7c46b2ed3c
We install all default hal implementations in /vendor/bin/hw along with
a few domains that are defined in vendor policy and installed in
/vendor. These files MUST be a subset of the global 'vendor_file_type'
which is used to address *all files installed in /vendor* throughout the
policy.
Bug: 36463595
Test: Boot sailfish without any new denials
Change-Id: I3d26778f9a26f9095f49d8ecc12f2ec9d2f4cb41
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@google.com>
This switches most remaining HALs to the _client/_server approach.
To unblock efforts blocked on majority of HALs having to use this
model, this change does not remove unnecessary rules from clients of
these HALs. That work will be performed in follow-up commits. This
commit only adds allow rules and thus does not break existing
functionality.
The HALs not yet on the _client/_server model after this commit are:
* Allocator HAL, because it's non-trivial to declare all apps except
isolated apps as clients of this HAL, which they are.
* Boot HAL, because it's still on the non-attributized model and I'm
waiting for update_engine folks to answer a couple of questions
which will let me refactor the policy of this HAL.
Test: mmm system/sepolicy
Test: Device boots, no new denials
Test: Device boots in recovery mode, no new denials
Bug: 34170079
Change-Id: I03e6bcec2fa02f14bdf17d11f7367b62c68a14b9
hal_*_default daemons whose policy is in common/device-agnostic policy
are provided by the vendor image (see vendor/file_contexts). Thus,
their policy should also reside in the vendor image, rather than in
the system image. This means their policy should live in the vendor
subdirectory of this project.
Test: Device boots and appears to work
Bug: 34135607
Bug: 34170079
Change-Id: I6613e43733e03d4a3d4726f849732d903e024016